Conceptual understanding and representations in physics teachers in training

Main Article Content

Elba Milagros Mairena Molina
Yasser Alexander García Flores
José Javier Payán

Abstract

In physics teacher training, mastery of concepts such as Newton's laws is fundamental for understanding more complex phenomena. Therefore, developing a solid foundation in these topics as future teachers is essential for interpreting, explaining, and solving contextual situations. For this reason, this study aimed to determine the scientific understanding and representations of Newton's laws among final-year students in the Physics and Physics-Mathematics Education program. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach and involved 40 students, selected as key informants. Data was collected using a questionnaire designed to explore students' conceptual preparation in three key categories: understanding concepts, representing physical phenomena, and analyzing and interpreting them from a mathematical perspective. The results showed that students perceptually report feeling confident in applying mathematical concepts to physics topics. While free-body diagrams are complex in some aspects, they are useful for representation and problem solving. They also expressed difficulties in understanding Newton's laws, although not as significant. Practically speaking, weaknesses were found in conceptual understanding, errors in representational or graphical representation, and difficulties in mathematical analysis. These findings highlight important challenges and commitments for improving the professional preparation of these future teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mairena Molina, E. M., García Flores, Y. A., & Payán, J. J. (2026). Conceptual understanding and representations in physics teachers in training. Mendive. Revista De Educación, 24, e4366. Retrieved from https://mendive.upr.edu.cu/index.php/MendiveUPR/article/view/4366
Section
ARTICLES

References

Arons, A. (1997). Teaching introductory physics. John Wiley & Sons.

Bauer, W., & Westfall, G. (2024). University Physics with Modern Physics (3.a ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/university-physics-with-modern-physics-bauer.html

Danielo, B., & Coleoni, E. (2024). Aprendizajes de un profesor de física en formación: Lo didáctico y lo afectivo. Revista de Enseñanza de la Física, 36(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.55767/2451.6007.v36.n1.45313

Duit, R., Gropengieber, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). Modelo de Reconstrucción Educativa: Un Marco para Mejorar la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje de Ciencias. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.

Knight, R., Jones, B., & Field, S. (2023). College Physics: A Strategic Approach (4.a ed.). Pearson Education.

Martín-García, J. (2021). Nada es lo que parece: Una reflexión sobre las visiones deformadas de la ciencia. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: ted, 50, 257-274. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-38142021000200257&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es

Saldaña, J. (2021). Manual de codificación para investigadores cualitativos (4.a ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited.

Soto Alvarado, M., Vergara Sandoval, C., & Valenzuela Ferry, J. (2024). Caracterización de explicaciones del profesorado de física en formación respecto a las competencias modelizadoras. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 21(3), 3601. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2024.v21.i3.3601

Tipler, P., & Mosca, G. (2010). Física para ciencias e ingenierías (6.a ed.). W. H. Freeman and Company. http://archive.org/details/20201109_20201109_2034

Vázquez, B., Jiménez, R., & Mellado, V. (2019). El conocimiento didáctico del contenido (CDC) de una profesora de ciencias: Reflexión y acción como facilitadores del aprendizaje. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 37(1), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2550

Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2016). University Physics with Modern Physics. Pearson Learning Solutions.

Most read articles by the same author(s)